I acknowledge this. I also acknowledge that gun-rights (both legally and culturally-exercised) have been overall advanced since the '94 AWB. I am not sure if the state (or the 2A) was a necessary mechanism to advance gun-ownership, or if the state was just an adversary to gun-ownership.

My overall faith is in the American people. They chose to exercise their rights when the state removed it's restrictions. I hope they choose to hold their ground if any new restrictions are imposed. But for that to happen, their decision will need to be on the fundamental right, not on what the state chose to ratify (the 2A).

I acknowledge this. I also acknowledge that gun-rights (both legally and culturally-exercised) have been overall advanced since the '94 AWB. I am not sure if the state (or the 2A) was a necessary mechanism to advance gun-ownership, or if it was just an adversary to gun-ownership.

My overall faith is in the American people. They chose to exercise their rights when the state removed it's restrictions. I hope they choose to hold their ground if any new restrictions are imposed. But for that to happen, their decision will need to be on the fundamental right, not on what the state chose to ratify (the 2A).

I acknowledge this. I also acknowledge that gun-rights (both legally and culturally-exercised) have been overall advanced since the '94 AWB. I am not sure if the state was a necessary mechanism to advance gun-ownership, or if it was just an adversary to gun-ownership.

My overall faith is in the American people. They chose to exercise their rights when the state removed it's restrictions. I hope they choose to hold their ground if any new restrictions are imposed. But for that to happen, their decision will need to be on the fundamental right, not on what the state chose to ratify (the 2A).