24
TheStupidestBitch 24 points ago +26 / -2

Except she supports BLM, which is a marxist organization that hates libertarians. You might as well hold a loaded gun to your dick with your foot or something.

2
TheStupidestBitch 2 points ago +2 / -0

She's right. It's cool because you paid twice as much for it in 2020 as you would have in 2019.

6
TheStupidestBitch 6 points ago +6 / -0

Looks like he's about to use it as a blow gun.

12
TheStupidestBitch 12 points ago +12 / -0

Congratulations for your loss. :(

2
TheStupidestBitch 2 points ago +2 / -0

Radical centrist standing by.

4
TheStupidestBitch 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm gender fluid and accidentally sexually assaulted myself and have now entered an infinite loop of retaliatory self-sexual assault equalization.

9
TheStupidestBitch 9 points ago +10 / -1

Video shows that the shooter's group was trying to incite the "patriot group" into doing something as they were leaving. Their rally was over. Literally, the shooter's pal was telling bear-mace-guy to shoot/mace him, similar to the bald pedo in Kyle's case.

bear-mace-guy steps away from that situation, and ends up near the shooter. Shooter appears to attempt to take something (possibly the mace) from bear-mace-guy, bear-mace-guy smacks shooter, shooter draws, bear-mace-guy begins deploying mace, shooter fires a single shot into bear-mace-guy's head.

Whole situation is fucking retarded. Here's a song:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CoxQWFtqaYM

2
TheStupidestBitch 2 points ago +2 / -0

It's a meme. It never should've been taken seriously, by anyone.

5
TheStupidestBitch 5 points ago +5 / -0

Hey is this that gun from the movies that is a handheld shotgun that you don't have to aim?

How is it to zap carry? Does it press on the prostate?

4
TheStupidestBitch 4 points ago +5 / -1

The issue is then that factions are formed and then new ideals under different umbrellas pop up.

So, literally 'Merica? I made the assumption that, if there was a fight, it would be a fight to protect the rights of individuals. That is, it would be a fight for the freedom to have different ideals than your neighbor. This is the only common ideal anyone need have: That everyone has the right to live as they see fit, so long as it doesn't infringe on other's right to do the same.

Seems that by "centralization", you mean you want everyone to organize under some set of ideals that appeals to you. In reality, all anyone needs to rally around is the idea that we each have inalienable rights that must be preserved. That alone allies us all together against authoritarianism in all of its forms, including and especially commies.

12
TheStupidestBitch 12 points ago +12 / -0

OP's post glows so bright I gotta wear shades.

All anyone needs is a reliable identifier of "friendlies" that doesn't get used until AFTER the rule of law has perished. If things are genuinely collapsing, determining friend from foe is essential. Before then, you're just painting a big target on yourself. Kinda like when you wear your bright yellow "Don't Tread on Me" shirt to the grocery store.

Until things start really going south, just shut the fuck up and blend in. No need to make yourself a target of the commies or the glowies. No need to advertise, as you'll only scare normies and rile up authorities.

You're a greater asset when you have income. This isn't an "I am Spartacus" moment. Your coworkers aren't going to defend you from a corrupted HR department.

Lay low until the system is actually in danger of collapse. If you must take action, take political/social action. Do so by networking with like-minded lawyers, politicians, business owners, community leaders, etc. In other words: Make friends who think like you do and help each other with day-to-day shit. Be active in your community.

Don't go trying to organize under some ridiculous banner. The police and the feds don't like competition.

view more: ‹ Prev