Is the current Black Liberals Matter protests driving the US to become the next Rhodesia?
(media.weekendgunnit.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (18)
sorted by:
Simple answer, no. Rhodesia was always less than 10% white. The reason Ian Smith and the white Rhodesians fought so hard against majority rule despite near universal international condemnation and trade embargoes was they knew that majority universal voting rights given to the black population would spell doom for the white citizens. As we all know, the black population in the U.S. is roughly 13% and expected to remain fairly constant. What isn't is the overall hispanic population.
Honestly if I had to make any predictions, in the coming years the U.S. will look increasingly like Brazil. A very racially diverse nation with high crime rates. There won't be any real black supremacy beyond symbolic gestures like more leading roles in medieval fantasy movies and more stupid made-up holidays, but I don't think the overall situation of african-americans will improve. Also as the hispanic population in the U.S. increases, black power will decrease because hispanics can't really be guilt tripped by the whole slavery and "evil white people" thing. Make of this analysis what you will.
To bring this back to weapons discussion, I would recommend anyone interested in Rhodesia to check out "A Handful of Hard Men". The shit the Rhodesian SAS pulled off is inspiring. I'm talking 200 men vs 10,000 and only taking 10 casualties as opposed to the ZANLA's 8000.
What's really interesting is that second generation Hispanics reliably vote Republican. If that holds, I think you're correct in how that will impact crime statistics. But I think Brazil's problems are more related to the governments instability.
Speaking of Brazil...has Tarus finally gotten any better yet? Is it still a gun just for people who want to shoot thier dicks off and masturbate with rubbing alcohol?
They really don't tho. South America is the way it is because Hispanics, as a people, consistently vote for leftist politicians. There have been several cases of the lefties taking over, the military or moderates gaining power and fixing the situation, then the next generation voting for the same lefty shit again. Peru and Chili being two I can think of right off the top of my head.
What you are thinking of is almost all other immigrants, the second generation voting for the right. Hispanics, and Muslims are the only two demographics that, as a voting block, consistently don't shift with further generations.
Also, Taurus is still shit.