A Question about the 2nd Amendment
(media.weekendgunnit.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (44)
sorted by:
Everyone's always arguing about small arms. Obviously, we need to repeal the NFA, and all the other laws against third holing.
But, in order to overthrow an oppressive regime, we the people need more than just small arms. INB4 "heavy artillery" and "muh nukes". We the people, have a right to both ICBMs and tactical nuclear weapons. But, that's not what this is about.
What about medium artillery? Next time you're bragging about your collection, tac gear, and defense plan, please ask yourself: "how many howitzers do I own?"
I've always wanted a Dshka. And a toyota. Lame serious talk though, not sure I stand on explosives. From a purist view yeah, we need them. But in practice, I think their use for commie-related terrorism is higher than just using a 20mm ATR.
Synthesizing explosives in a non-weapon, non-commercial context is completely legal, along with using them.
Blowing up a tree is often the safest way of removing it, and I have a bad back so I wasnt going to use a chainsaw regardless
Also, fuck hydraulic hammers. They beat the shit out of equipment. Explosives and clean up the mess are far superior.