With how awful BLM and Antifa are ran it’s more clear than ever that centralization to a degree is the only way of being effective. If the boog classifies itself as a militia then constitutionally we can conduct ourselves unabated. I just want to get this discussion started or else this is just a big joke where I have principles and rights I want to uphold. What’s the overall consensus besides me being a fag?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (43)
sorted by:
I thought militias were illegal?
What? Have you read the second amendment? Lol
Sort of.
https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2016/10/paramilitary-militia-laws-training/
Under California law, it is illegal for a “paramilitary organization” to train with weapons if it engages in “instruction or training in guerrilla warfare or sabotage.” Violators are subject to one year of imprisonment and/or a fine of up to $1,000. When I asked the California attorney general’s office if there was any reason to believe that CSM’s activities might violate state law, a spokeswoman said the office was unable to provide any legal analysis and declined to comment further.
Nationwide, 41 states have laws that place restrictions on private paramilitary activity. The laws fall into two categories: those that limit or regulate private military groups and those that limit or regulate private military training. The penalties vary. In Idaho, training people in ways to maim or kill with the intent to further “civil disorder” is punishable by up to 10 years in prison and/or up to a $50,000 fine. In Pennsylvania, training people to use guns or bombs with intent to further civil disorder is a first-degree misdemeanor. Arizona law forbids anyone besides the government from maintaining “troops under arms”
I can assure you that any militia I may join in the future will definitely be all about maintaining civil order. Whether that involves the government or not is entirely dependent upon government fulfilling its role in the civil order.
That is state law and federal law supercedes that, I dont see why a court would side with some faggot statute over the constitution. That makes no sense at all