How many have faked getting it.
WE WILL NEVER SUPPORT YOUR ZIONIST NEOCONSERVATIVE CIVIC NATIONALIST EGALITARIAN FEMINIST WHITE GENOCIDE-HOCKING SHABBOS GOY WHORE.
- Donald Trump is a zionist in the same vein as all the others before him.
- Donald Trump is a neoconservative in the same vein as all the others before him.
- Donald Trump is a civic nationalist.
- Donald Trump disavows and condemns white nationalism.
- Donald Trump supports white genocide in all of his policies.
- Donald Trump supports murdering any white person who hates jews.
- Donald Trump’s entire family either married or dates jews.
- Donald Trump’s dad was personal friends with Netanyahu and local New York rabbis. Never mind Kushner.
I’m glad the jury beat down the Karen in Chief. Now my hope is that the riots are terrible (read: ACTUALLY. EXIST. AT. ALL.) so that we can get a repeat of dead communists.
Yep, exactly. I think there was a report about that very thing earlier today, but it’s totally unverified.
You don’t seem to understand: there is no such thing as justice or objectivity anymore. What’s taking so long is that they’re probably going to declare him guilty. Internal reports are citing fear of doxxing and riots if he’s acquitted. And whites won’t do anything about it.
jew shows no regard for the lives of the people it considers soulless animals
You’re surprised?
Why would any gun owner support Trump?
This image is ontologically painful.
Who are you? Why are you replying to someone else’s comment? Do you have anything at all to add to any discussion? Why do you support white genocide?
Fuck off, in other words. You don’t have anything to add here.
The US may not have your "racial integrity" or whatever you call for.
Okay? Was there a continuation to this point?
And who gives a damn about there being different pockets of ethnicities in this country.
Literally anyone who is concerned about a fifth column being built for domestic terrorism. Read a history book.
Being able to have a traditional American breakfast, traditional tacos, and authentic Taiwanese cuisine all in the same day is one of the great things about this country, and all of them can live their traditional cultures.
You are either joking (Poe’s Law) or you need to go back to Reddit where your brain damage is actually believed.
The thing that all Americans should be United under are the ideals of freedom, Liberty, personal responsibility, and respect.
America is a white nation. Nonwhites do not and cannot understand, respect, or engage in white conceptions of liberty, freedom, personal responsibility, or respect. You were literally just told this.
For the purposes of this discussion, Who gives a damn what color skin the person beside you has as long as they're standing beside you?
Because they are, by definition, not doing so, BIOLOGICALLY, and if you had read my post you would understand why.
All that most good men and women want is to be left to live their lives in peace
Imagine. What a concept, right? So stop invading my peace by advocating that the subhuman scum of the earth be allowed to enter my country without my permission.
and we should be able to stand together in defense of that against those who would force a different way of life upon us
Hence why I am standing in defense of you and your GENOCIDAL BRAINWASHING.
Reply to the content of the above post (not this one, because that’s not what “above” means) or don’t fucking reply again. Civic nationalism is an objective falsehood. It is the cause of the collapse of every single nation in history.
Yep, reported. You’re done.
Don’t care. Reported for continued spam and harassment. You admitted you were lying. We’re done.
Reported for violating every rule the board has. You’ve outed yourself. It’s over.
Thanks for admitting I’m right, leftist.
Reported for spam, yeah. You’ve admitted I’m correct. We’re done here.
Imagine being so pathetic that you go back four months to spam someone’s posts.
You have admitted that I am correct, paid shill.
Oh, and just because you’re too brain damaged to be alive, here are the founding fathers telling you to kill yourself.
“Where was there ever a confederacy of republics united as these states are, or in which the people were so drawn together by religion, blood, language, manners, and customs?” ~ John Dickinson; Fabius Letters, #8
“Providence has been pleased to give this one connected country to one united people–a people descended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to the same principles of government, very similar in their manners and customs.” ~ John Jay; The Federalist Papers, #2
“Nothing is more certainly written in the book of fate than that these people are to be free. Nor is it less certain that the two races, equally free, cannot live in the same government. Nature, habit, opinion has drawn indelible lines of distinction between them.” ~ Thomas Jefferson; letter to George Washington on the physical removal of Africans from the United States; January 4, 1786
“To be consistent with existing and probably unalterable prejudices in the US, freed blacks ought to be permanently removed beyond the region occupied or allotted to a white population.” ~ James Madison; letter to Robert J. Evans; June 15, 1819
“The influx of foreigners must, therefore, tend to produce a heterogeneous compound; to change and corrupt the national spirit; to complicate and confound public opinion; to introduce foreign propensities.” ~ Alexander Hamilton; The Examination, #8
“The number of purely white people in the world is proportionally very small. I should wish their numbers were increased. But perhaps I am partial to the complexion of my country, for such kind of partiality is natural to mankind.”~ Benjamin Franklin; Observations Concerning the Increase of Mankind, Peopling of Countries, etc.
And more!
“What good man would prefer a country covered with forests and ranged by a few thousand savages to our extensive Republic, studded with cities, towns, and prosperous farms embellished with all the improvements which art can devise or industry execute, occupied by more than 12,000,000 happy people, and filled with all the blessings of liberty, civilization and religion?” ~ Andrew Jackson; speech to Congress; December 6, 1830
“The Chinese have no British instincts or British feelings or aspirations. If the Chinese came in great numbers and settled on the Pacific coast, they might control the vote of that whole province, and they would send Chinese representatives to sit here, who would represent Chinese eccentricities, Chinese immorality. Asiatic principles altogether opposite to our wishes, and, in the even balance of parties, they might enforce those Asiatic principles, those immoralities–the eccentricities which are abhorrent to the Aryan race and Aryan principles–on this house. The Aryan races will not wholesomely amalgamate with the Africans or the Asiatics. The cross of those races, like the cross of the dog and the fox, is not successful; it cannot be, and never will be.” ~ Sir John A. MacDonald, first Canadian PM; Electoral Franchise Act debate
“[Man] has diverged into distinct races, or as they may be more fitly called, subspecies. Some of these, such as the Negro and the European, are so distinct that, if specimens had been brought to a naturalist without any further information, they would undoubtedly have been considered as good and true species.” ~ Charles Darwin; The Descent of Man, vol 2, p. 388; 1871
“More than half the difference between the average I.Q. of American whites and Negroes is due to genetic reasons, and will not be eliminated by any foreseeable change in the environment. Moreover I think the social consequences of this are likely to be rather serious unless steps are taken to recognize the situation.”~ Dr. Francis Crick, Nobel laureate, co-discoverer of DNA; letter; 1971
“There is no firm reason to anticipate that the intellectual capabilities of peoples geographically separated in their evolution should prove to have evolved identically. All our social policies are based on the fact that [black, et. al.] intelligence is the same as ours, whereas all our testing says not really. There is a natural desire that all human beings should be equal, but people who have to deal with black employees find this not true.” ~ Dr. James Watson, Nobel laureate, co-discoverer of DNA; Avoid Boring People: Lessons from a Life in Science; 2007
“A general belief seems to prevail in the colony that Indians are little better, if at all, than the savages or natives of Africa. Even the children are taught to believe in that manner, with the result in the Indian is being dragged down to the position of a raw Kaffir.” ~ Mahatma Gandhi; letter to the Natal parliament of South Africa; 1893
“I started off believing all men were equal … I now know that’s the most unlikely thing ever to have been, because millions of years have passed over evolution, people have scattered across the face of this earth, been isolated from each other, developed independently, had different intermixtures between races, peoples, climates, soils.” ~ Lee Kuan Yew, first Prime Minister of Singapore
FUCK OFF, PROPAGANDIST.
“What could have been more natural than that a movement calling itself, here, communism, there, marxism, somewhere else socialism (but always having a base which I found easiest to describe by the word equalitarianism) should in its strategy include subversion of sciences as well as governments? Page by page my amazement grew. Here was clever and insidious propaganda posing in the name of science, fruitless efforts to prove unprovable theories… the pattern began to repeat itself, the slippery techniques in evading the main issues, the prolix diversions, the sound without substance.” ~ Carleton Putnam; Race and Reason: A Yankee View, pp. 16-18; 1961
no argument
Reported. Eat shit. You have nothing to add. You’re just here to spam. Thanks for admitting that everything I said is fact.
Congratulations on being objectively wrong about everything you believe. Fuck off somewhere else, neoliberal shill.
Way to miss the forest for the trees.
Way to not understand what you’re saying.
My argument is that grouping people together based on ridiculous, unqualified characteristics like race is stupid.
You have no argument. You are objectively incorrect about everything you believe. Your beliefs were inculcated into you by people who want you exterminated from the face of the earth. They publicly said this 100 years ago when they began doing it. Nothing you believe is true.
People are individuals and should be judged as such
Only white people think this way. You know absolutely fucking nothing about psychology, neurology, genetics, sociology, or any of the related topics. Historically you wouldn’t be allowed to vote because you’re so fucking stupid.
A nation shapes a culture, and it does so based on the unique biology of the ethnic group that comprises it. A nation is, by definition, a single ethnic group. A person is made to feel safe–and comfortable, and trustworthy–when all members of his society are like him. What if they’re not? When multiple ethnicities or even races (species) cohabit a plot of land, you have “civic nationalism,” on which we spoke briefly earlier. Civic nationalism is anticulture. Without the ability to trust the members of your society, people “hunker down” and become less charitable, less willing to work together, and less open to cultural events. Culture stagnates and dies in a multicultural society. The bitter irony is that civic nationalism is itself a product of a culture which trusts too much–a waste product. Championing civic nationalism is self-defeating. Civic nationalists may still praise the “constitutional principles” they hold–freedom of speech, the right to bear arms, limited government, etc. These principles are laudable, but only within the context of a monoracial society and single culture. Civic nationalists, however, demand judgement of an individual only, not a collective. This hyper-individualistic outlook forces civic nationalists into a cognitive box, limiting the extent of their philosophical willpower. When you reject judgement in the context of racial groups as a collective, you reject the fact that races act as collectives. Civic nationalist philosophy is in conflict with nature, and as such it causes ruin. Let’s take the example of the United States.
Latin American “hispanics”–Homo americanis and various mixed race groups of the same–support gun control, laws which criminalize speech, and large government. They overwhelmingly identify with left-wing and communist political parties. They also demonstrate an elevated fertility rate relative to white populations. By upholding civic nationalist principles in judging them as individuals instead of as a group, tens of millions of them have been allowed into the United States, despite their collective belief in the destruction of the principles upon which the US was founded. They do not say this when attempting to gain entry. Deception, after all, exists. Civic nationalist arguments regarding vetting procedures are underwhelming. It is extremely difficult to artificially enforce a culture in any group of people who did not develop it. Like most ethnic minorities in the US, Latin Americans do not demonstrate a collective belief in the civic principles of the US. They do behave as a collective, though–supporting left-wing groups in overwhelming majority. Said groups call for the destruction of the principles that civic nationalists support–free speech, gun ownership, and small government. Civic nationalists do not demonstrate the philosophical willpower to enforce their own values. If they did, the populations of nonwhites which have been in the US for several generations–exposed to US values for that time–would support US values. But they do not.
While on the subject, why do Latins support leftist groups? They vote as a collective, and they do so to serve collective interests. Leftist groups in the US loudly promote increased immigration. Increased immigration, particularly of their own kind, will lead to an increase in population for them. That means an increase in their collective political power. Regardless of an individual Latin’s personal political stance, he supports leftist groups as a collective to serve his collective racial interest. We see the same sort of behavior in Africans, Asians, and all other nonwhite groups. Leftist political groups are very happy to assist in this endeavor. Further, these groups–aided by jewish political and social organizations–explicitly advocate for nonwhite collectives. Simultaneously, they do everything in their power to silence, slander, demonize, and deplatform all white advocacy groups, through accusation of association with “racism,” “white supremacy,” “Nazism,” and/or “antisemitism,” among other claims. Left-wing groups in the US, particularly the influential jewish wing, explicitly advocates against white advocacy. This is why no explicitly white advocacy organizations exist in the US today.
Leftists have been so successful in their efforts in this regard that traditional US population demographics have utterly disintegrated. The white population–the only population which demonstrates support for civic nationalism, or for the tenets of human civilization–is being displaced. Deplatformed. Dispossessed. Exterminated. What conclusion do we reach from this analysis? We can discern that the civic nationalist position is philosophically unequipped to combat an existential threat to its philosophy. Civic nationalist ideals demand its followers make judgements on strictly individual grounds, such as to ignore racial behavioral trends. They thus seek to argue in favor of judging a long line of individuals as individuals on principle. But no discernment is made for whether these individuals are simply pretending to uphold beliefs solely to enter the country. No determination is made whether they will, subsequently, act in their own racial interests to create new demographic conditions which no longer judge “the individual.” This change thereby destroys civic nationalists’ proposed ideals.
Here is where the culture of a nation is destroyed. Nonwhites do not care about the civic duties or virtues upheld by whites. They act as racial collectives to serve their collective interests only. White civic nationalists do not have any ideological mechanism to combat–or even change–this state of affairs. They protest, on the basis of their principles, when fellow whites attempt to combat or change this. Civic nationalists thus demonstrate that they are operating from an obsolete playbook, attempting to espouse ideals of individualism that can only be maintained in homogenous, white nations, free from competition from myriad nonwhite collectives. This failure is demonstrable throughout electoral politics in the US–and the entire Western world–over the last 60 years. If civic nationalists are allowed to keep their policies, there will cease to exist a legal substrate for their own principles. Nonwhites will simply vote away the ability to judge someone individually, the right to free speech, ownership of firearms, and a government which is not communist in nature. These principles will cease to exist in either US or the rest of the West. This will be the death of the culture of the United States. It will happen due to demographic replacement–ethnic genocide–of the white Anglo-Saxon Protestants (WASPs) who exclusively founded the United States and wrote its laws and constitutional principles.
There is a final nail in the coffin for civic nationalists’ individualistic ideals, specifically regarding the notion of individual judgement for immigration: Regression to the mean. This is a well-documented phenomenon in population genetics whereby the children of outliers within a population tend to gradually “shift” toward the average of their racial group. The result is as follows: judgement of individual is an entirely static exercise. It can only be made in an instant, for that particular instant, and not applied to any amount of time in the future, nor for a long-term plan for the nation. In practice, this is the act of granting work or study visas to “the best” of certain ethnic groups so they may learn or settle here. This practice is inherently faulty, as the individual’s offspring are not guaranteed traits which meet the standards by which that individual was allowed entry. The best regress… to the average.
race, skin color, and sexual orientation have nothing to do with honor, decency, or moral character.
Faggots rape children institutionally. Commit suicide, child rape apologist. No one is talking about skin color but you. Race has fuck all to do with skin color. You know nothing about race.
People like you are the exact reason I love having my guns so much
Why, because you refuse to use them to defend objective truth?
If society truly did end, I’d spend my free time hunting scum like you down
Congratulations; you’ve publicly admitted to being a communist agent and a deranged psychopath NKVD member. You’ve revoked your right to have an argument and are in violation of site rules and US law.
keep your warped views of traditionalism
Literally repeating verbatim what the founding fathers said.
[DURRRRRRRR I REPEAT MASS MEDIA QUOTE AND CALL U NAME CUZ I NO HAVE ARGUMENT OF MY OWN AND NO CAN REFUTE WHAT U SAY]
K, thanks. Reported for being a paid shill.
Oh, in that case, I’ll have a baconator and a box of 5.56.
No, you’re a piece of shit because you buy into collectivist thinking.
Oh good! An actual argument! Was that so hard? Now to blow you the fuck out.
When one bases a worldview upon natural law, upon the immutable form of nature itself and the facts which arise from it, you get what is known as traditionalism. Traditionalism here will refer explicitly to the Western sense of the word–the way of life in the European nations and their former colonies–and thus the societies built by whites, the world over.
Where modern society is explicitly egalitarian–often by force–traditionalism is meritocratic. Those within a society may succeed or fail based on merit, meaning work or success thereat. Where modern society denies the existence of natural law, traditionalism predicates itself on an objective reality that can be discovered and defined scientifically. A traditionalist society is as has already been described–monoracial in nature. Traditional society was homogenous, both genetically and culturally. Even today in cosmopolitan regions like large cities, people refuse to mix with one another and form little enclaves of their social group–Chinatown, Little Italy, any of various jewish districts in cities (known as eruvim), etc. You can see this by viewing any demographic map of any city on Earth. Collectivism obviously exists. People want to be with their own kind. Traditionalism is the preservation of one’s people, language, culture, traditions, and way of life. Culture is a lifestyle, and a nation is its people. But a nation is also more than just its people–it’s where they live. The condition of a people’s environment also dictates their health. These elements define a traditional way of life.
You may as well be one of those blue-haired commies
You are objectively incorrect and suffering from brain damage.
if you’re going to push against individualism.
Man is not an island, you filthy pathetic libertine coward. You’re a child screaming about things he doesn’t understand. You’re a degenerate sack of shit unfit to call yourself human, never mind American, when the Founders would spit in your face for being so animalistic.
Decadence in modern mass multicultural societies begins at a moment when there is no longer any discernible meaning within society. Meaning is destroyed by raising individualism above all other values, because rampant individualism encourages the anarchical proliferation of egotism at the expense of the values that were once part of the national heritage, values that give form to the concept of nationhood and the nation state–to a state which is more than just a political entity, and which corresponds to a particular people who are conscious of sharing a common heritage for the survival of which they are prepared to make personal sacrifices. Man evolved in cooperating groups united by common cultural and genetic ties, and it is only in such a setting that the individual can feel truly free, and truly protected. Men cannot live happily alone and without values or any sense of identity: such a situation leads to nihilism, drug abuse, criminality, and worse. With the spread of purely egotistic goals at the expense of the altruistic regard for family and nation, the individual begins to talk of his rights rather than his duties, for he no longer feels any sense of destiny, of belonging to and being a part of a greater and more enduring entity. He no longer rejoices in the secure belief that he shares in a heritage which it is part of his common duty to protect–he no longer feels that he has anything in common with those around him. In short, he feels lonely and oppressed. Since all values have become strictly personal, everything is now equal to everything; e.g., nothing equals nothing.” ~ Alain de Benoist, Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft: A sociological view of the decay of modern society
Stop eating any food you didn’t kill yourself. Stop using any tools you didn’t make yourself. Stop living in society. Go live in the fucking woods. Stop using the internet. It was built on collectivism. Stop drinking water you didn’t filter yourself. Stop using any item of any sort you didn’t make yourself.
Run the fuck along, kid. You’re a disgrace to even your communist friends.
The NRA helped write the NFA. They’ve never been on our side.