The following will glow so hard you may get cancer just reading it. You have been warned.
We all know how actual communists look. Scrawny teenagers surviving on their mom's credit card. We also know that paid actors who are being subsidized by the afforementioned credit cards are more than able and willing to destroy copious amounts of property and life.
How does the State discourage workers from going into a certain market? They make it dangerous. They start a "war on drugs" so that midwit normies don't buy/sell drugs. They make it illegal and punishable by death to own certain kinds of firearms/accessories to firearms and as a result, many people stay out of that business.
Now, property and life destruction are very immoral acts and must be prevenbted so far as is possible, and these are also punishable under natural law by retaliatory force of any degree necessary to prevent them.
When next there is a march of "Communists" who are burning, looting, and murdering, disruption by force would do much to discourage future "communists" from accepting the money.
Enough disruptions would raise the risk to such an extent that commie protests would become negligible. The few that would still happen would have to be comprised of some actual communists, which will be hilarious when these very people are shown to be the rich brats they are, and the communists are destroyed by their own golems.
Similarly, when there is a knock on your door from paid actors ("Communists", "Antifa"), violent resistance will not only save you, but your neighbours as well.
</fedpost>
(((They))) want to have the property values decline as much as possiable so they can buy everything and put everyone into "affordable housing" that way they own us, just like in 1984 the (((state))) is all knowing
You will own nothing, with no privacy, and be happy...
Glad someone else has this little conspiracy. People are fleeing cities, just so happens the local governments are buying up the property while putting everyone out of work.
It's a question of system integrity. Right or wrong, how long can a system function if a large percentage of that system's population don't feel the system is fair and think they have a better shot by bucking the system than playing along anymore?
That's not meant to be a political statement one way or the other just historical fact. And fascists of every stripe and political wing have exacerbated the underclass who feel there's not enough hope that their a lot will change in the current system and so what are they going to lose if the system is upended?
Basically quoting Rousseau there- government came about in order to protect the property of the 'haves' from the 'have-nots'. The 'have-nots' will always outnumber the 'haves,' so concessions must be made in order for the 'haves' to keep most of their property less it all be taken unlawfully.