No one's talking about it but the rasmussen polls place beijing biden as having lower approval than Trump had when he eas elected or when he left office.
The bill of rights hating filth pay attention to massive noncompliance in places like new zealand where they don't have the history of rebellion and guns like we do and know, for a fact, that Americans would be much worse. Feel proud!
Those fucks are pushing thier narrative so hard right now.but they don't have the actual public support they think they do since their half formed miscarriage of a fake president didn't actually get elected.
Also, that ugly taxidermied corpse looking weakling has previously admitted he cannot do away with ARs through executive order. Bump atocks were a small "fuck you" without a lot of money or advocacy. The blessed and holy AR is much different.
They're going to want registration so that a ban later can grab most of them that fags turn in.
80% kits and pistol braces like the SBA3 or such are in real jeopardy as they don't quite have the numbers and support. It's close though. That lawsuit put forth by the SAF, Rainier arms and two disabled veterans have some real merit.
The Dems love having a AWB in the works to get idiots like mom's demand action to donate to them.
The key to those continued donations is that said ban is always in the works.
It's never going to be something as blatant as outright grab, at least bit with Biden. That might come later, but they're going to go after things that cause a chilling effect like online sales and the stuff you mentioned.
Real talk you think they have a shot at honoestly restricting online sales? In an entirely online era that is a hard thing to justify. Though unnatural, unprecedented regulation is a hallmark of guns, if the '89 import ban applied to electronics and cars imagine the outcry!
Honestly probably not. Even if it somehow passed, which I don't really think it would be able to if the SCOTUS remains even remotely true to the constitution, they would just drive the market underground and make it worse for themselves.
That would..... That would be really awesome actually. There has to be a legal argument to file suit for about applying the import ban to electronics and firearms.
Sure, it would probably hurt our economy in the short term, but it would absolutely fuck over China. Yeah yeah yeah "China has a real market and 500 million people" - sure it does, but 470 million of them are functionally peasants, and if they lost the US as a consumer market their GNP would tank hard. Rich chinese and eurocucks can't account for anything over 50% of their market share.
And it would force US companies to reinvest in US manufacturing infrastructure, which would still exist to a reasonable extent if Dixon and then Killary and Kompany didn't go balls out on globalization
Honestly? No.
No one's talking about it but the rasmussen polls place beijing biden as having lower approval than Trump had when he eas elected or when he left office.
The bill of rights hating filth pay attention to massive noncompliance in places like new zealand where they don't have the history of rebellion and guns like we do and know, for a fact, that Americans would be much worse. Feel proud!
Those fucks are pushing thier narrative so hard right now.but they don't have the actual public support they think they do since their half formed miscarriage of a fake president didn't actually get elected.
Also, that ugly taxidermied corpse looking weakling has previously admitted he cannot do away with ARs through executive order. Bump atocks were a small "fuck you" without a lot of money or advocacy. The blessed and holy AR is much different.
They're going to want registration so that a ban later can grab most of them that fags turn in.
80% kits and pistol braces like the SBA3 or such are in real jeopardy as they don't quite have the numbers and support. It's close though. That lawsuit put forth by the SAF, Rainier arms and two disabled veterans have some real merit.
The Dems love having a AWB in the works to get idiots like mom's demand action to donate to them.
The key to those continued donations is that said ban is always in the works.
It's never going to be something as blatant as outright grab, at least bit with Biden. That might come later, but they're going to go after things that cause a chilling effect like online sales and the stuff you mentioned.
Real talk you think they have a shot at honoestly restricting online sales? In an entirely online era that is a hard thing to justify. Though unnatural, unprecedented regulation is a hallmark of guns, if the '89 import ban applied to electronics and cars imagine the outcry!
Honestly probably not. Even if it somehow passed, which I don't really think it would be able to if the SCOTUS remains even remotely true to the constitution, they would just drive the market underground and make it worse for themselves.
They ban cool cars as well. Want the banned Land Rover and Hilux.... https://www.hotcars.com/20-cars-that-are-banned-in-the-us/
YET THEY ALLOW THE MOTHERFUCKING PRIUS!
That would..... That would be really awesome actually. There has to be a legal argument to file suit for about applying the import ban to electronics and firearms.
Sure, it would probably hurt our economy in the short term, but it would absolutely fuck over China. Yeah yeah yeah "China has a real market and 500 million people" - sure it does, but 470 million of them are functionally peasants, and if they lost the US as a consumer market their GNP would tank hard. Rich chinese and eurocucks can't account for anything over 50% of their market share.
And it would force US companies to reinvest in US manufacturing infrastructure, which would still exist to a reasonable extent if Dixon and then Killary and Kompany didn't go balls out on globalization