Couldn’t the steppers use this as an excuse to curtail the 2nd amendment?I don’t really trust the Supreme Court at all to make a ruling that isn’t shaped by MSM pressure and social pressure from their corrupt shitty D.C. cocktail parties
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (20)
sorted by:
Give someone a burger and they'll bitch it's not a double with bacon.
Everyone was sad the court wasn't getting involved. Now they're involved and it's not good enough?
If you followed the last case against ny gun control you would know that ny changed the law rather than face the supreme court decision.
This is different though because there is no way those whores will voluntarily adopt shall issue carry.
So, yeah, this might actually be a huge thing for shall issue CCW. Relax and have some hope.
Now the "pack the court" and eliminate the filibuster talk will start hardcore. That's the shit to worry about.
Uncle Scruffy
Good take uncle scruffy I just worry about Roberts and Coney Barrett. They’ve voted against a lot of “conservative” issues that would draw the ire of the democrats
I feel like the difference here is incremental, they ruled against election challenges because that.....would have been A THING. That might have tipped the balance too far and thus bring out the crazy conflict that seems to be brewing.
Giving the country away to commies to avoid a possible civil war between patriots and commies and their useful idiots. That's 200 level IQ.