-
He should not have been there that night.
-
What he did was foolish and dangerous
-
He went there with the intent to cause trouble and commit crimes.
-
He deserved much worse than he got.
-
The fact that he was carrying a gun that he wasn't legally allowed to have should be enough to convict him.
And that's all I have to say about GaigeGrosskreutz.
The millisecond he threatened Kyle, he got what he deserved. Federal gun laws are illegal.
this
Real based fucking take right here.
shall not be infringed...he did however deserve to be shot
He wasn't a felon. He was the only one Kyle shot at that night who wasn't. He had a sketchy record short of that and he's a habitual drunk with a DUI problem, but he's not yet a felon.
If a new DA gets in because of this case and cleans up the shop, they might yet charge him with armed assault of some sort for pointing that Glock at Kyle. Statute of limitations on that is probably quite a few years.
Perhaps. But this treating felons as second class citizens does nothing except force them to return to crime. If they've payed their debt to society, Let them have their rights back.
And then if they try to attack someone else then let them be shot and have that be the end of it.
That is why we should mutilate them until they cant commit crime.
40mm buckshot rnds?
Do these exist...or are we dreaming fren?
Some rehabilitated felons need firearms more than most citizens because bad-blood from their past life is a danger to them.
Felons that have not been successfully rehabilitated still have access to firearms.
Punishing felons for possessing firearms only puts rehabilitated felons in danger and does not prevent reoffending felons from using weapons to commit crimes.
He wasn't a felon. He had a sketchy record short of being a felon, he's a habitual drunk, but he's not federally barred from gun ownership.
More DUIs and that might change...