With how awful BLM and Antifa are ran it’s more clear than ever that centralization to a degree is the only way of being effective. If the boog classifies itself as a militia then constitutionally we can conduct ourselves unabated. I just want to get this discussion started or else this is just a big joke where I have principles and rights I want to uphold. What’s the overall consensus besides me being a fag?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (43)
sorted by:
I think the opposite is needed. Centralization, especially the kind that is known to your adversary gives them something they can attack; with its defeat demoralizing those who are behind that movement. A close-knit decentralized group however, unified by a common goal cannot be pin-pointed. This obviously comes with the draw back of having no real command and control, but it’s safer for everyone involved. If there were a George Soros cash cow type individual out there for the patriots of this nation who remained concealed and simply funded these close-knit groups, we could probably get somewhere.
The issue is then that factions are formed and then new ideals under different umbrellas pop up. Then there can be constant in fighting. Anonymous works because it isn’t an entity based around combat, it’s solo operators hacking in the name of anonymous. That is great when you can hide behind a computer, but when you’re talking about actual combat, with no centralization or some form of command, that gets wiped out real quick. Also, (I know this is in extreme cases) what if a war actually happens, is what we fight for just handed back to the politicians to fuck us again? What is proposed here by zero centralization is just a more violent type of rioting because nothing will come of it other than violence. I don’t want that, I want a group that can be taken seriously and be listened to for the principles we stand for, our first and second amendment rights. That’s why 2024 we need to all vote libertarian, it’s the only way to get things going in the right direction.
So, literally 'Merica? I made the assumption that, if there was a fight, it would be a fight to protect the rights of individuals. That is, it would be a fight for the freedom to have different ideals than your neighbor. This is the only common ideal anyone need have: That everyone has the right to live as they see fit, so long as it doesn't infringe on other's right to do the same.
Seems that by "centralization", you mean you want everyone to organize under some set of ideals that appeals to you. In reality, all anyone needs to rally around is the idea that we each have inalienable rights that must be preserved. That alone allies us all together against authoritarianism in all of its forms, including and especially commies.
Appeals to me? I’m an originalist, I follow the constitution to exactly how it is written, I have nothing new to add to create something different. I want us all to get back to following the constitution before this country is lost forever