Made you look.
I have no common ground with a blue-pilled Libertarian. Best thing for us is to simply stop talking.
How's this for decent moral standing?
https://nypost.com/2020/06/25/blm-co-founder-describes-herself-as-trained-marxist/
Also you've provided no convincing information at all.
Know that you failed miserably to convince me of anything.
Nice backpedal.
"I was only PRETENDING to be retarded!" - You
I really don't give a shit about what YOU mean by anti-racist. The literature and the zeitgeist around anti-racism is anti-white. Anti-racism is racism against whites.
And it's collectivist. BLM is a marxist organization. BLM hates Libertarians.
Number 3 is simply being "not racist", which basically everyone was already doing.
I'm not strawmanning you. I'm telling you that you don't know what you're defending and aligning yourself with. Read the anti-racist literature, or at least watch the anti-racists talk about it. It is not as straight-forward as you wish it was.
I'm definitely going to cry myself to sleep tonight from this pwnage.
You can manipulate a PERSON via guilt tripping, you can't manipulate a person's RIGHTS via guilt tripping.
So, yeah, voting for Jorgensen was a fuckwit thing to do. You should feel bad for doing it, especially when you're turning in your guns. You still have your right to vote like a fuckwit, though.
See how that works? I guilt tripped you, but your right to throw away your vote is still fully intact and totally not manipulated at all. So have at it.
Ok:
Guilt tripping you is not akin to manipulating your right to choose.
And you doubled down on trying to use THE NAME I CHOSE FOR MYSELF against me, which is even more sad.
Nah, bro. Like I said, being "not racist" is plenty. I don't have to actively hate my own race and atone for things that I wasn't even alive for, and that none of my family ever participated in.
I honestly wish you the best in your endeavor to swim across the BLM current by yourself, though.
Oh fuck you got me!
Sad you thought that was clever enough to post.
Guilt-tripping is not the same as taking your rights. Words have meanings, you know?
Good luck swaying the narrative to use your (reasonable) definition of anti-racism. The hard truth is that you can't win by using their terms and playing their game.
Throughout the 90's and 2000's it was more than plenty to simply be not-racist. Only recently has anti-racism come about. And at a time when society had already shunned racists en-masse.
The only way to win this game is to not play.
This fuckin' idiot shot himself in the forehead with a 50BMG and lived to make a fucking video about it.
Legend.
Dude weed lmao.
There is something very wrong with that statement. If you read the material, anti-racist is a euphamism for anti-white. BLM and wokeness are built on the idea that white supremacy is the cause of all problems. Even better, anyone who is white is complicit in an oppressive white-supremacist system. Hence, systemic racism is the reason why people of color can't succeed.
It's pretty obvious that your understanding of this stuff is superficial at best. The reality is that wokeness is a subversive ideology designed to start a race war. It's been deployed all over the US in education, and has established a foothold in massive corporations.
Identity politics always leads to genocide. Humans have been down this path many times.
No one's taking your right to choose who you vote for, they're just calling you a fucking idiot for voting the way you did.
If you voted Libertarian, you brought a checkers board to a chess match.
If you voted Baiden, you're a traitor, a glowie, a commie, or all of those things.
Also none of this actually matters because the state no longer abides by the Constitution. Therefore we don't have to, either.
When I was a kid we a had a kennel toad. It hung out in the dog kennel and ate their food. It was enormous. Probably ate mice, too. No proof of that, though.
Something I've been mulling over lately is:
I'm a socialist when it comes to my immediate family. They get whatever they need up to what I can provide.
I'm a libertarian when it comes to my community, city, state. I really just want to do business at this level and then fuck off to my homestead. And everyone else can fuck off at that point, too.
I'm a federalist when it comes to my nation and dealing with other nations. I want a nation that is unified and strong enough to preserve itself, but I want them to stay the fuck out of my business.
I'm guessing that a lot of Americans are like this, but have different boundaries. I think the typical bleeding heart liberal thinks of their community and their nation the way I think of family... The typical conservative is probably more federalist at the city/state level. I think it'd be interesting to see a random sampling of this. But I'm fairly certain that very few people really think about themselves this way.
target shooting is just golf with more of that 'tism.
Ask them to define "far right win extremist".
When they inevitably say something about gun-toting white spreeemacist nazis, ask them to define each term they used.
Keep doing it until you can prove that they don't actually know what any of those things actually are, and they're just going around parroting the far-left narrative, tell them to get bent.
Of course, this requires you to actually know what those things are, so you can educate them when they expose their ignorance.
Then turn it around on them and call them a genocidal communist useful idiot who will inevitably end up in the gulag along side you, so they can see how it feels.
Only gun owners should be allowed to vote.
Considering that Trump and others have been saying for months that this exact type of fraud would occur, uh... Yeah this election is exceptionally fucked up.
Alex Jones also told us just a week or so ago on Rogan's podcast that this exact thing would happen. "79 days of hell" and what not.
The main thing is that, I can't believe that ANYONE would actually vote for either a dementia patient or an insanely corrupt and authoritarian California District Attorney. Especially not a majority of people. And in record numbers. It's absolutely absurd.
classic firearms currently has a bunch of ~$600 ARs for sale.
The "communist brainwashing" is actually demoralization. They erode away a person's morale and convince them that they're so oppressed that the only way forward is to become rabidly anti-(insert sitting authority here).
It works on young people who don't have anything to lose. It works on people who are too timid to participate in society and/or the economy. It works on people who are already angry and have convinced themselves that they are victims.
Remoralization is an uphill battle. It requires giving someone the tools to make something of themselves and then stepping away and letting them build themselves up. These people need to see that they can get ahead even with a minimum of effort. They need to be allowed to win at SOMETHING or else they'll say the game is rigged and try to end it.
There are also a decent number of leftists/marxists who actually have attained some sort of success in our society, and simply feel guilty about it. To squelch their guilt, they beg to be taxed (without considering how it would affect other people like themselves), and beg to be oppressed by minorities, and beg to be blamed for all the ill in the world. They think that makes them "one of the good ones" and they'll be treated with exception when the revolution happens.
But the only people treated with exception after the revolution will be the elites who goaded all these useful idiots to action. That is, of course, assuming they even win. Which they won't. In a nation of 300,000,000+, somewhere around 10-50,000 people are causing chaos. Not all of them are even radical leftists. Plenty are just opportunists who decide to go smash and grab whenever a black man resists arrests and dies in the process.
The vast majority of Americans do not want revolution, do not want minority rule, and do not want the status quo to change. They want to continue consooming and cooming. And when push comes to shove, they'll side with whomever won't change too much.
Not trying to tell you what to do. Just sayin' that the libertarian party's candidate is either a complete airhead or not actually a libertarian.
Maybe even both.
What's tragic is that your defintion of anti-racism makes sense, but the definition of it outside your bubble stands in direct opposition to your individualism and will be used to bring you harm.