Means that banks can now discriminate against gun makers and retailers and deny them loans. If you do this to a minority it’s a federal crime, but if you do it to someone who likes guns it’s “progressive”
Buckle up and honk honk it’s going to be a long 4 years in clown world
In theory that money will get spent.
The economic issue that banks/competitors will face in this regard is that 1) there is no market alternative or competitor with guns, and 2) people who plan ahead for things like buying a shit ton of guns & ammo before they are heavily restricted/outlawed aren't people who will waste money on frivolous bullshit*.
It's not like when movie theaters closed, movie distribution companies contracted with HBO and Netflix instead of Regal Cinemas - there AREN'T any similar substitutes for guns or ammo in function, entertainment, use or need.
*I don't mean frivolous bullshit like $100 custom dildo foregrips for your PSA build. I mean frivolous bullshit like "oh I can't buy guns now so I'll spend my money on bullshit consumerism I don't need or want instead". My guess is a majority of that money would instead go towards savings, paying off debt, or higher quality alcohol and beef consumption. There isn't a dearth of alternative industries that would benefit the economy by making it harder to buy guns/ammo.
EDIT: leaving this up, I grossly misinterpreted what you meant. I was taking it as in if ALL banks stopped dealing with the gun industry entirely.
What i meant was that autists will go to any length to get more guns. Personally, i know EXACTLY where PSA's storefronts are in beautiful South Carolina. If i have to, i will drive there with gold bullion.
I know i'm a fanatic but i gotta feel like there are more that feel the same.