I'm definitely going to cry myself to sleep tonight from this pwnage.
You can manipulate a PERSON via guilt tripping, you can't manipulate a person's RIGHTS via guilt tripping.
So, yeah, voting for Jorgensen was a fuckwit thing to do. You should feel bad for doing it, especially when you're turning in your guns. You still have your right to vote like a fuckwit, though.
See how that works? I guilt tripped you, but your right to throw away your vote is still fully intact and totally not manipulated at all. So have at it.
See, you aren’t even technically correct (which we all know is the best kind of correct). I don’t want you to cry, I want you to make a commitment to critically think about the way you view things and the words that come out of your (digital) mouth.
Nobody can ‘win’ an argument; you can only grow from modifying your viewpoint in the face of convincing information. I hope the fact that I’ve provided reasoning and references for mine is enough. If it isn’t, you’re welcome
To go fuck yourself you noguns faggot.
What's tragic is that your defintion of anti-racism makes sense, but the definition of it outside your bubble stands in direct opposition to your individualism and will be used to bring you harm.
Well, the talk about ‘winning’ an argument was mostly to try and extend an olive branch to you and look for common ground. In reality, you’re so blatantly fucking stupid I’m surprised you know which holes in your body are made for breathing.
I'm definitely going to cry myself to sleep tonight from this pwnage.
You can manipulate a PERSON via guilt tripping, you can't manipulate a person's RIGHTS via guilt tripping.
So, yeah, voting for Jorgensen was a fuckwit thing to do. You should feel bad for doing it, especially when you're turning in your guns. You still have your right to vote like a fuckwit, though.
See how that works? I guilt tripped you, but your right to throw away your vote is still fully intact and totally not manipulated at all. So have at it.
I didn’t vote for Jorgensen.
See, you aren’t even technically correct (which we all know is the best kind of correct). I don’t want you to cry, I want you to make a commitment to critically think about the way you view things and the words that come out of your (digital) mouth.
Nobody can ‘win’ an argument; you can only grow from modifying your viewpoint in the face of convincing information. I hope the fact that I’ve provided reasoning and references for mine is enough. If it isn’t, you’re welcome To go fuck yourself you noguns faggot.
Also you've provided no convincing information at all.
Know that you failed miserably to convince me of anything.
Everything I’ve said is truthful by it’s own standing. You just have to be capable of critical reading to pick it up, I guess.
What's tragic is that your defintion of anti-racism makes sense, but the definition of it outside your bubble stands in direct opposition to your individualism and will be used to bring you harm.
Nice backpedal.
"I was only PRETENDING to be retarded!" - You
Well, the talk about ‘winning’ an argument was mostly to try and extend an olive branch to you and look for common ground. In reality, you’re so blatantly fucking stupid I’m surprised you know which holes in your body are made for breathing.
Go ahead and quote the backpedal, I’ll wait.
I have no common ground with a blue-pilled Libertarian. Best thing for us is to simply stop talking.