this is where I'm at

Oh, in that case, I’ll have a baconator and a box of 5.56.

d sexual orientation have nothing to do with honor, decency, or moral character.

Nah, fags rape kids at 44 times the rate of straight people, and raped kids are 8 times as likely to be fags. Fags rape kids which makes more fags which rape more kids which makes more fags.

Way to miss the forest for the trees.

Way to not understand what you’re saying.

My argument is that grouping people together based on ridiculous, unqualified characteristics like race is stupid.

You have no argument. You are objectively incorrect about everything you believe. Your beliefs were inculcated into you by people who want you exterminated from the face of the earth. They publicly said this 100 years ago when they began doing it. Nothing you believe is true.

People are individuals and should be judged as such

Only white people think this way. You know absolutely fucking nothing about psychology, neurology, genetics, sociology, or any of the related topics. Historically you wouldn’t be allowed to vote because you’re so fucking stupid.

A nation shapes a culture, and it does so based on the unique biology of the ethnic group that comprises it. A nation is, by definition, a single ethnic group. A person is made to feel safe–and comfortable, and trustworthy–when all members of his society are like him. What if they’re not? When multiple ethnicities or even races (species) cohabit a plot of land, you have “civic nationalism,” on which we spoke briefly earlier. Civic nationalism is anticulture. Without the ability to trust the members of your society, people “hunker down” and become less charitable, less willing to work together, and less open to cultural events. Culture stagnates and dies in a multicultural society. The bitter irony is that civic nationalism is itself a product of a culture which trusts too much–a waste product. Championing civic nationalism is self-defeating. Civic nationalists may still praise the “constitutional principles” they hold–freedom of speech, the right to bear arms, limited government, etc. These principles are laudable, but only within the context of a monoracial society and single culture. Civic nationalists, however, demand judgement of an individual only, not a collective. This hyper-individualistic outlook forces civic nationalists into a cognitive box, limiting the extent of their philosophical willpower. When you reject judgement in the context of racial groups as a collective, you reject the fact that races act as collectives. Civic nationalist philosophy is in conflict with nature, and as such it causes ruin. Let’s take the example of the United States.

Latin American “hispanics”–Homo americanis and various mixed race groups of the same–support gun control, laws which criminalize speech, and large government. They overwhelmingly identify with left-wing and communist political parties. They also demonstrate an elevated fertility rate relative to white populations. By upholding civic nationalist principles in judging them as individuals instead of as a group, tens of millions of them have been allowed into the United States, despite their collective belief in the destruction of the principles upon which the US was founded. They do not say this when attempting to gain entry. Deception, after all, exists. Civic nationalist arguments regarding vetting procedures are underwhelming. It is extremely difficult to artificially enforce a culture in any group of people who did not develop it. Like most ethnic minorities in the US, Latin Americans do not demonstrate a collective belief in the civic principles of the US. They do behave as a collective, though–supporting left-wing groups in overwhelming majority. Said groups call for the destruction of the principles that civic nationalists support–free speech, gun ownership, and small government. Civic nationalists do not demonstrate the philosophical willpower to enforce their own values. If they did, the populations of nonwhites which have been in the US for several generations–exposed to US values for that time–would support US values. But they do not.

While on the subject, why do Latins support leftist groups? They vote as a collective, and they do so to serve collective interests. Leftist groups in the US loudly promote increased immigration. Increased immigration, particularly of their own kind, will lead to an increase in population for them. That means an increase in their collective political power. Regardless of an individual Latin’s personal political stance, he supports leftist groups as a collective to serve his collective racial interest. We see the same sort of behavior in Africans, Asians, and all other nonwhite groups. Leftist political groups are very happy to assist in this endeavor. Further, these groups–aided by jewish political and social organizations–explicitly advocate for nonwhite collectives. Simultaneously, they do everything in their power to silence, slander, demonize, and deplatform all white advocacy groups, through accusation of association with “racism,” “white supremacy,” “Nazism,” and/or “antisemitism,” among other claims. Left-wing groups in the US, particularly the influential jewish wing, explicitly advocates against white advocacy. This is why no explicitly white advocacy organizations exist in the US today.

Leftists have been so successful in their efforts in this regard that traditional US population demographics have utterly disintegrated. The white population–the only population which demonstrates support for civic nationalism, or for the tenets of human civilization–is being displaced. Deplatformed. Dispossessed. Exterminated. What conclusion do we reach from this analysis? We can discern that the civic nationalist position is philosophically unequipped to combat an existential threat to its philosophy. Civic nationalist ideals demand its followers make judgements on strictly individual grounds, such as to ignore racial behavioral trends. They thus seek to argue in favor of judging a long line of individuals as individuals on principle. But no discernment is made for whether these individuals are simply pretending to uphold beliefs solely to enter the country. No determination is made whether they will, subsequently, act in their own racial interests to create new demographic conditions which no longer judge “the individual.” This change thereby destroys civic nationalists’ proposed ideals.

Here is where the culture of a nation is destroyed. Nonwhites do not care about the civic duties or virtues upheld by whites. They act as racial collectives to serve their collective interests only. White civic nationalists do not have any ideological mechanism to combat–or even change–this state of affairs. They protest, on the basis of their principles, when fellow whites attempt to combat or change this. Civic nationalists thus demonstrate that they are operating from an obsolete playbook, attempting to espouse ideals of individualism that can only be maintained in homogenous, white nations, free from competition from myriad nonwhite collectives. This failure is demonstrable throughout electoral politics in the US–and the entire Western world–over the last 60 years. If civic nationalists are allowed to keep their policies, there will cease to exist a legal substrate for their own principles. Nonwhites will simply vote away the ability to judge someone individually, the right to free speech, ownership of firearms, and a government which is not communist in nature. These principles will cease to exist in either US or the rest of the West. This will be the death of the culture of the United States. It will happen due to demographic replacement–ethnic genocide–of the white Anglo-Saxon Protestants (WASPs) who exclusively founded the United States and wrote its laws and constitutional principles.

There is a final nail in the coffin for civic nationalists’ individualistic ideals, specifically regarding the notion of individual judgement for immigration: Regression to the mean. This is a well-documented phenomenon in population genetics whereby the children of outliers within a population tend to gradually “shift” toward the average of their racial group. The result is as follows: judgement of individual is an entirely static exercise. It can only be made in an instant, for that particular instant, and not applied to any amount of time in the future, nor for a long-term plan for the nation. In practice, this is the act of granting work or study visas to “the best” of certain ethnic groups so they may learn or settle here. This practice is inherently faulty, as the individual’s offspring are not guaranteed traits which meet the standards by which that individual was allowed entry. The best regress… to the average.

race, skin color, and sexual orientation have nothing to do with honor, decency, or moral character.

Faggots rape children institutionally. Commit suicide, child rape apologist. No one is talking about skin color but you. Race has fuck all to do with skin color. You know nothing about race.

People like you are the exact reason I love having my guns so much

Why, because you refuse to use them to defend objective truth?

If society truly did end, I’d spend my free time hunting scum like you down

Congratulations; you’ve publicly admitted to being a communist agent and a deranged psychopath NKVD member. You’ve revoked your right to have an argument and are in violation of site rules and US law.

keep your warped views of traditionalism

Literally repeating verbatim what the founding fathers said.

[DURRRRRRRR I REPEAT MASS MEDIA QUOTE AND CALL U NAME CUZ I NO HAVE ARGUMENT OF MY OWN AND NO CAN REFUTE WHAT U SAY]

K, thanks. Reported for being a paid shill.