Christmas decorations?
(media.weekendgunnit.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (50)
sorted by:
AYO! DIS NIGGAS GOT DAT NEANDERTHAL DNA N SHIEEEET!
*proceeds to dance with copious hip thrusting*
*proceeds to kill multiple other blacks in a drive-by with a stolen gun while leftists blame legal guns owned by yT for muh gun violence epidemic*
*proceeds to never invent anything of merit, erect a monument, develop a civilization, domesticate an animal, create a sailboat, or invent a wheel or wheelbarrow*
I'm so glad race is just skin color!
You forgot never inventing written language
I had that and a few others and erased it.
There is apparently one written language developed by Sub Saharan Africans.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nsibidi
Developed in 400 A.D. I'm skeptical of course since it has no parent system, no child system, never spread, and was primarily used by a secret society within the African tribe that developed it. But yeah, there's pretty much nothing else. The only other written language developed geographically in Sub-Saharan Africa was not developed by native Africans but resettled Jews. LMAO.
If you're going to be cringe, don't do it with easy fact common knowledge stuff:
Egypt*
Kush
Nok
Carthage
Mali
Also, the North Africans had plenty of domestic animals (Numidian Calvary how the fuck can you forget that) but Sub Saharan didn't have animals capable of domestication. With all our technology today we can domesticate Zebras and shit
*I'll grant debatable but not if you're of the Grah Hancock persuasion
Semitic
Rulers were Semitic
From the Sahel (Closer to modern Berbers than Sub-Saharan Africans)
Phoenician (aka Semitic)
Finally, an actual Sub-Saharan people. The Mali “empire” is mostly a leftist fanfic created by hack, left-wing “historians” who greatly exaggerated the grandeur of it. It was only an empire because it happened to sit on a fuckload of gold.
Most of the civilizations you mentioned are North African. North Africans are wholly genetically distinct from Sub-Saharan Africans. In fact, North Africans are genetically closer to Europeans than Sub-Saharans.
North Africa had large access to European trade, information, technology, and bloodlines. Egypt was an empire of Greeks. King Tut was a red head. This can be seen in their artistic portrayals of the ruling class featuring light skin and green and blue eyes compared to dark skinned brown eyed slaves etc.
There are plenty of domesticatable animals in Sub Saharan African including the Musk Ox and Zebra. Companionship animals like dogs and big cats are also possible to domesticate. This largely wasn't done. Did Africans lack imagination? Could they perhaps have traded some of their vast resources with the Arabs, Chinese, and Europeans for better animals? Only if they saw that as an advantage, which apparently none of them did. It wasn't just a difficult herd of critters then.
(Shrugs, throws some singles)