In theory that money will get spent.
The economic issue that banks/competitors will face in this regard is that 1) there is no market alternative or competitor with guns, and 2) people who plan ahead for things like buying a shit ton of guns & ammo before they are heavily restricted/outlawed aren't people who will waste money on frivolous bullshit*.
It's not like when movie theaters closed, movie distribution companies contracted with HBO and Netflix instead of Regal Cinemas - there AREN'T any similar substitutes for guns or ammo in function, entertainment, use or need.
*I don't mean frivolous bullshit like $100 custom dildo foregrips for your PSA build. I mean frivolous bullshit like "oh I can't buy guns now so I'll spend my money on bullshit consumerism I don't need or want instead". My guess is a majority of that money would instead go towards savings, paying off debt, or higher quality alcohol and beef consumption. There isn't a dearth of alternative industries that would benefit the economy by making it harder to buy guns/ammo.
EDIT: leaving this up, I grossly misinterpreted what you meant. I was taking it as in if ALL banks stopped dealing with the gun industry entirely.
You no see the Glocktoberfest on the bottom?? You need ophthalmologist appointment perhaps??
It's more making fun of commies for bitching about how much they complained about Bernie "getting screwed" for a second time, and then rallied behind Comrade Joe and Commiela Harris as though those 2 weren't directly responsible for creating and enforcing 90% of the police problems that lefties were rioting about all summer long.
And I needed a creative outlet for my rage for a half hour at work this afternoon since my Cuckbook feed was full of inauguration updates as though I want to hear more about people who hate freedom getting sworn into office.
I like guns, I hate BATFEces and nobody is invading Rhodesia yet so there's still nothing worthwhile to use my vacation time for
I mean, yeah, that has already BEEN happening. The left has been bitching about voter registration laws and voter ID requirements for 2 decades, while also demanding that illegal immigrants be given equal rights as American citizens - which, for the most part, I am okay with, except for when it comes to voting.
Corporations dodge WAY bigger tax bills than illegal immigration is responsible for. But corporations at least have the decency to pay for policy change with drugs, bribes, lobbyists and soft money rather than disgrace the one fragile thing that makes people believe representative government still exists - the notion that one citizen = one vote.
Because when it instead means one person = one vote and you don't even have to be who you say you are and you don't have to be American, you bet to Christ I'm going to bring a suitcase full of wigs and fake mustaches to the polls and my district is going to vote 98% libertarian that year
Let's not forget that questioning the integrity and competence of the US Postal Service, the most severely underfunded government agency/department in existence, and their ability to keep ballots secure (when the security of mail trucks is 100% reliant on the unspoken understanding and social contract that most people have around "nobody wants mail fucked with, right?") caused lefties to scream "WHY ARE YOU AGAINST FAIR ELECTIONS????????"
Exactly. That's essentially how it looks like police responded to the majority of BLM protests, the difference being BLM protesters were doing things like yelling directly in cops faces about how they want them dead and in jail for hours on end (and then were surprised when super lethal tear gas was fired into crowds that were carrying glass bottles, bricks and skateboards after a previous night's worth of burning and looting storefronts)
Chickens are good for eggs, tendies and wings, that's it.
Except for this guy. This guy deserves NODS, coke, a new truck and something from HK chambered in .308