This looks like you copied a science website and you added a bunch of random stuff to it. If you check the chemical formulas its just a few different formulas for varying stages of rust.
It almost like you're just trying to get this guy to piss on his rif....wait. Nevermind this all checks out. Piss then heat and a wrench will absolutely work. Forget I said shit
Wait, how am I the asshole here? Why are you giving me shit? I don't see you saying anything to the guys saying "gas the likes", "1488", "black people have never done anything of value" and all the other stuff.
You sure I'm the asshole on the situation?
And yes, I fucked a chick, twice actually which is pretty good for a guy uses a sawzall to cut up mule dear and can't spell prestodigataschen.
I hate that type of stuff with a passion. I'd never push to banish or punish them but I am all for lambasting them and pointing out how dumb they are. They should be publically shamed in the tard forum of record. There's a few running around here
Also fuck them
OP said "Jews run the world, faggot" in this thread and a past thread. Maybe you you didn't see it. But it's in reference to that.
I'm also not arguing that two Jews and Obama want gun control. Instead, I'm saying that two name Jews and Obama not evidence that some global Jewish order controls the world/wants your guns.
I am saying the Democrats want to take your guns. Jewish Dems, Muslim Dems, White Dems and Black Dems. Democrats full stop want your guns.
As smart as you are to figure out a centuries old mystery, but can't read 3 paragraphs.
You are objectively dumb
Sure, but what does that do to the idea that jews run the world? Because you end up at one of two places:
- Jew command orders Jew lieutenants to order Jew underlings to trick white people into secretly working for them for the Jew world order
Or
- the Democrats that explicitly state "I want your guns" are telling the truth and it's not a conspiracy, it's a stated political goal.
Trump didn't have a conspiracy to build a wall, he came out and said it. There was no Reagan conspiracy theory of tearing down the wall, he told Gorby to do it.
The enemy isn't cloak and daggers, they are in the open. Pretending it's a conspiracy that you can do nothing about but shout on the internet, instead of finding common cause with people (of any skin color) who would stand against it is cowardice
Lol, remember poop knife? Don't know why but that's what I thought of
Democrats want to take your guns, moron. Yes some of them are Jews, but more of them are white.
Don't forget that orthodox Jews tend to vote republican (and increasing number) and support 2A. Non religious Jews populate on the left.
https://www.jta.org/2020/02/03/politics/i-think-its-israel-how-orthodox-jews-became-republicans
Now I know you buy into all this "one world Jew government" but that's dumb. You're inventing conspiracies to take your guns when the Democrats, the ones actually making a point to do so, are pushing that to actually take your guns. But, instead of focusing against them you're wasting you time on century old conspiracy bullshit. I'd be oou have never taken a moment to consider has history behind that either, have you? Maybe ever thought "why have the Jews been historically persecuted"? Probably too nuanced for you anyway.
You know that by doing this you make 2A causes dismissable, right? They don't have to debate you because your screaming about Jews and fake moon landings and birds not being real. You are playing into their favor and you don't even know it.
Ever wonder why Democrats were so closely related to the 1960s Democrat party? Have you ever researched anything about it? Imagine being some jew dude in the 60s chilling out at some jew holiday with your jew family. At the prayer you mom starts crying. Dad starts too and they begin to say the names of those that were killed in the War. They tell you how Germany went the way it went and what lead up to it, so that it won't happen again. Then you turn on the TV and you see uniformed police officers with batons and dogs attack black people. Mobs in the streets screaming at them, using all the racial epithets (the one you think are so edgy and cool), and the beatings. Plus non equal treatment under the law. Seems familiar to your parents stories. You know this story, you see how and where it goes. I don't have the stat in front of me but I think I saw it in Clive Webb's "Fight against Fear: Southern Jews and Black Civil Rights" that said something north of 90% of non blacks involved on the ground in civil rights were Jews. You think it's because of some conspiracy that the Jews turned on the secret jew radios they keep in their sheckles and got word from Jews command. But actually, it's because they knew their history.
Clearly they were wrong. The "arrow" for civil rights was trending up not down. The US would never be like Nazi G. Of course, the Democrats did something worse to Black America with he model cities program and fringe Marxist ideology that LBJ pushed, but that didn't matter. At the time the Jews in America saw that history doesn't always repeat itself, but it rhymes.
So when a bunch of white democrats come for your gun and you're screaming about the Jews I promise they will chuckle, write you off as crazy, and you will be useless to the 2A cause.
Can I get one? Because it is.
Fair point on the penis I guess, but the meth likes it this way and whatever it takes to get it in her mouth, I'm probably down for.
Common core is horse shit but I don't see why you single out the Jews. It's the left in its entirety that parades that shit around. Plus they don't hide it, they claim it. Sure plenty of Jews push it but most are secular jews (super weird but dig a little and the Jewish community is divided and the secular ones are on the left).
I have zero issues with education on the Holocaust. We should review it regularly or we forget how evil we can be, it's an affront to humanity and it does us well to see it. I also don't blame Jews for it being a big deal in their life. I live in the South and the Civil War is still a topic. Who cares about feel good bills, Alabama passes a bill every few years to recertify keeping God on the currence and shit. Who cares.
Why is Israel bad though? A stable free government in the middle east? Plus a good ally? Don't forget the Suez crisis when we ordered the Jews to back off. Maybe we back them because our goals are aligned? I thought you would be all for Israel so the Jews can live there. Like Liberia for Blacks?
Besides I know you believe in all that social engineering eugenics stuff. I'd wager that you subscribe to thoight that the reason black people in America are typically in better physical shape is through natural selection, right? Because the vast majority of blacks in the country were brought here as slaves and then worked in horrible conditions and the most physically fit survived. The most physically fit male and mated with the most physically fit females and they produced the most physically fit offspring and so on and so forth until we get the massive bull your GF likes. After a couple generations you have in a very odd way produced a eugenics experiment that you never wanted to, right? And people don't like this theory because they start comparing black people to horses or animals and selective breeding. That's not what I'm doing here. But if that's true even to the smallest degree could that not apply to Jews?
Honestly, this is where the argument gets interesting to me because history starts to intersect with behavior. Remember in the middle ages people thought that the Jews created the Black plague because Jews were disproportionately unaffected by the plague. When actually it probably had more to do with the fact that the Jews religion mandates certain levels of cleanliness. Specifically by washing hands before and after meals. That's not much defense against a plague but it's something. Enough that it helps explain the disproportionate death rates. People like to use the stereotype of the covetous and greedy Jew but let's remember the Catholic Church outlawed usury and declared it a sin. Usury, which is the lending of money and charging interest, was outlawed so Christians could lend other Christians money but they could not charge interest on that transaction. Muslims also don't believe in usury even to this day Muslims use special mortgage companies that have completely different structures to the transactions to not be Haram. But not the jews, they have no such religious beliefs. Since the middle ages, Jews have had a corner on the finance market because they were the only people that could. None of the Catholics could loan you money but the Jews could. How would they not use that niche in society that are benefit? Moreover, this perpetuates a cycle where it makes sense for Jews to be in financial fields as well as associated field (legal, accounting, management) and really any place where they can work with money. Over time you tend to get people that have a history and experience in that field. Just the way that southern plantations were (if you buy that theory) a catalyst for black people to become physically fit so were European markets the place that caused the Jews to study more and take on more intellectual careers since the beginning.
This organ is also the reason that people tend to say the Jews stole Palestine from Muslims. Now, they didn't, but you're an uneducated muslim and you're starving and you have no money and then a Jew comes with this contract and money and offers to buy your land, what do you do? Maybe you don't really understand the contract but you sign it because you need money and food and now you feel swindled a decade later because of clauses in the contract or whatever. But both sides agree on a contract so is it that bad?
I know I kind of rambled there but I think you should check out Daryl Cooper's martyr made podcast about israel, it's really long but if nothing else it will give you a perspective on the Jewish state that makes sense and I think is applicable in the real world. He does a phenomenal job of telling the story from the Muslim point of view as well to where you can really see what a sticky problem it is.
So to summarize, and again I apologize for rambling it, makes sense that one cultural group would want to perpetuate their cultural group. I don't think you and I are any different than that. I do think that the American left is pushing cultural changes via education and institution in a way that's disgusting and that we should fight. Which is why it pisses me off a motivated guy like you who knows that, is instead choosing to focus their energy on something dumb like race. If you really want to stop the left at the bullshit they're doing you have to fight it on their court and you have to figure out who's an enemy and what's just bullshit or rational. Because you are absolutely right there are statistical disparities in positions of power but I contend it has more to do with their historical influences than it does some secret blood-sucking cabal.
Besides, no one can keep a secret. Especially not through centuries
Don't forget you're working on a response here too
First, review the difference between "tame" and "domesticated" I swear you were built from spare parts. Bears can be tamed, Gorillas can be tamed, hell even batshit liberal women can be tamed. But they cannot be domesticated. Domestication involves multigenerational captive breading (amongst other things And besides the occasional success breaking one, that doesn't mean it bears lineage that will respond that way. Here's a quick one that talks about that here
Why does that matter? Because domestication is about long term breading and use. One Zebra is great, but if it's foals are still crazy and unresponsive then you have a pet that provides little use, especially in the mass numbers necessary to establish a civilization level benefit. They did find success with a "Zonkey" but clearly that had a Donkey that helped in the process.
Also, I'm excited you brought up the Rothschild's bet about one (I'm sure you think thats evidence and part of some New conspiracy) but that's a very well known case and I was hoping you would mention it, everyone does when talking about this subject. Go back and read the article you linked and look at the time, expense and absolute amount of previously acquired equestrian knowledge that made that possible. Again, taming an animal is a different thing than domestication. As we still can't domesticate them today (but we can, still, tame them). I know you're thinking "take enough of them and..." No, again, read the first article, that's not how this works
Your second paragraph must have been written by some kind of retard whose parents were also cousins because it's dumb even by your standards. Africans had canoes, just like Indians. African had cities of comparable size of Indian and South American ones. None of that is even debatable. Africans had farming techniques, they were similar to the native societies you just mentioned. Then your line about uncreative and dumb is so uncreative and dumb I'm starting to think I'm arguing with an 8 year old since there's no way to prove any of that. And since, as we established, Africa has plenty of civilizations. Please go back and review any of the affor mentioned sub-saharan societies we talked about earlier, you'll see examples of all the stuff you said didn't exist.
I'm starting to think maybe you're brain damaged because it's unreal how dumb you sound. Just an aside, I'm showing this to people I work with, even the black ones and they aren't mad at all. They feel like your education system has failed you. Black people, objectively smarter than you, pity you.
Indians did get Horses and it revolutionized their society. Issue was they got them after their civilization collapsed due to an estimated 90% of them dying from disease. I feel like you should know some of this. It's comical how poorly read you are. We've already went over how far behind you are when advanced societies show up at your door.
Those IQ studies you talk about are of MODERN PEOPLE. If you don't understand why a well educated white guy in Virginia has an IQ higher than a Sudanese man who's been fighting war for years then you're pretty fucking embarrassing. Even the IQ difference in the US have less to do with skin color and more to do with zip code.
You can think black folks are dumb, but I want you to step back and realize how absolutely inept this argument made you look. You would think, being so certain of how smart your race is you would spend some time utilizing all that big brain you've got but clearly you don't. The certainty with which your last paragraph was written is awesome, it's like your dumb, and you know your dumb, and it was proven you're dumb but you're happy just being dumb
Your bullshit racism only hurts our forum.
Just saying name isn't evidence, it isn't even an accusation.
"Jews own companies and run organizations that do things I don't like" isn't a conspiracy, that's part of the world. BLM is absolutely a socialist organisation but they admit that. But how is that part of an overall jewish conspiracy?
How are the Rothschilds in charge of the Fed? What's the link between the Fed and ANTIFA? What's the connection that indicates that's an overarching Jewish plot? Break it down since you understand it
Also, still waiting here too
Please, rebuttal welcome. Real quick:
Forgive the hyperbole but to be clear: Cape Buffalo aren't ACTUAL tanks, Zebras arnt literally retarded (allegedly), and Tigers don't live in Africa (which was a reference from The African Queen, good movie, check it out) Glad you got the joke?
And no, Cape Buffalo have never been domesticated. Maybe it's possible with modern/future technology, infinite money, and nothing better to do but to what end? For anyone without modern technology to do it is laughable. Sure, catching a wild boar in a snare and moving it into a pen seems hard but, not impossible. After a couple pig generations (remember within a couple months new born pigs can breed) it's not hard to imagine a friendly bacon pet. Now, do the same for indians domesticating Buffalo (we really only just sort of figured that out now) and take away horses because they didn't have those yet. What kind of fence can you build to hold one? How to you separate two from the heard of hundreds without the others coming to free it? Oh shit you need to be able to prevent it from attacking you as well. Impossible in the old world but, I guess I'll see if you can supply proof.
I don't expect you to ever get around to your rebuttals though
So you're an ancient European. You wake up every day and drink a glass of milk from your cheeseburger machine, eat some fresh butt nuggets from your walking chicken tendie and then spend 8 hours in the field tilling and planting or some such shit. Then at the end of the day you put away the Ox, slaughter the magic animal that makes bacon, ham, and sausage. Eat a massive dinner, bang your big tittied blonde wife and still have like four hours in the day to paint, or invent or work on projects that don't involve your survival.
Juxtapose that vs ancient african who wakes up and doesn't have friendly fast food animals hanging out. Then he has to use his big black body that, in a few centuries would be the bull to u/miggers wife but instead has to do all the work. So either he works longer than his Euro counterpart or is less productive. He then goes home, eats a less nutritional and small meal, bones his wife because he's also not yet the bull for u/ATFNoKillDoggo s mom and has no spare time to invent floaty bois to go find the white women. u/300tist hates both of those guys and finds those family members to ugly to fornicate and would rather the black guy do it, bit also hates the two
Eventually you get to building your first boats but your so far down the tech tree that Zeng Hi rolls up with a 500 foot long monstrosity and sweeps you from the waves. No asian chicks to bull either.
To be fair, that's not an area I know a ton about but that's a summation almost verbatim from Gun, Germs, and Steel
Wait wait wait wait one fucking minute bro. You mean to tell me you knew who all these empires were advanced and you still said Africans never invented civilization or written word knowing all those people existed? That's a special kind of stupid. Certainly Semitic tribes were close to Europeans that doesn't make them not Africans. But who cares let's get to the real shit then! North Africa certainly are genetically different from sub-saharans but that's not the argument you wanted to have and you apparently have some knowledge of African history. Now maybe you have more knowledge of African history than me because my dissertation was on bronze age Battle tactics which means I'm reading about a lot of African goat battles. So in that case then we can go really deep into African history.
While I agree that the left wing likes to trump up Mali as some kind of wakanda you can't deny that it wasn't effective empire. Sure they had gold and they used that resource to their best interest I'm not really sure how you fault them for that.
I know what you're waiting for me to say "Aksumite Empire!" to which you will guffaw because they traded with the Romans in the first century and we're christians and will throw out their writing system so, skip that one.
First then, the Kerma https://www.ancient-origins.net/ancient-places-africa/forgotten-kingdom-kerma-and-its-incredible-deffufas-006597 those fuckers built some shit. If you're into pre-Clovis stuff then these guys are all sorts of cool. But for regular folk it's notable what they accomplished WITHOUT animals
The Mapungubwe which became Zimbabwe? Short lived but they did the stuff you would attribute to empire.
Want me to say Zulu? Nah. Too easy.
Next I'd say look at Macrobia and the absolutely insanely large trade networks they had. So large that Cambyses (real or fake, Bardia anyone???) got tangled up with them and lost an army trying to cross the desert. Yes a Persian army beaten by a desert. Persian history is super bland but it's clear these Macrobians didn't fuck around. Even Herodotas of helikarnasus talked about them https://www.somaliwave.com/index.php?threads/who-were-the-macrobians.1706/ (sorry I can't find a better link but I can point you to books)
How about Maravi? They were in tight with Zheg He's trade stuff (if memory serves) and we're alligned with the Bantu. Which you'll remark "were slavers for Muslims and Christians" and I'll say yes! Duh! What's your point? Slaves have always existed. https://sovereignnations.com/2018/04/30/history-arab-slave-trade-africa/
Thoughts?
See, this is the kind of stuff I like, I won't bury the lead, you're wrong, like all wrong, and I'll prove it. Then you'll call me names or say it's a conspiracy or some other bullshit and go back to doing whatever low grade morons do all day...what's that called...Fortnight?
The entire Mediterranean was interconnected sure, your access to bloodlines is retarded because that would flow both ways, you know, like a society. But remember the Pyramids were built in fucking 2600 BC https://www.ancient.eu/article/862/the-step-pyramid-of-djoser/ and obviously the Egyptians existed earlier than that, much much earlier as the First Dynasty is like 3100 BC https://www.ancient.eu/First_Dynasty_of_Egypt/ What were our european ancestors doing then? Maybe stone henge?
Clearly, that First Dynasty predates recorded European history. Also Ptolemaic Egypt was Greek YOU GOT ONE RIGHT! BUT, founded in 305 BC. So like almost 3000 years after First Dynasty. Oof.
Light skinned africans are (wait for it) light skinned. Red hair is found all over africa, north and south of the Sahara (Himba people of namibia) and eye color also is wide spread, red hair and colored eyes are found in the Eurasian steppe and in Australia. WAIT YOU GOT ANOTHER ONE RIGHT! Egyptians certainly took slaves, we know this because, as you said, we have hieroglyphics about it. In case you weren't aware, hieroglyphics are a written language. They wrote it all over there massive empire that was big enough to traverse a continent and take slaves then build huge buildings that still stand.
There are no indigenous domesticable animals in Sub Sahara. Dumb people think because Zebras and horses look alike they are able to be domesticated but they aren't. Even today we can't domesticate Zebras because they are fucking retarded. https://www.scienceabc.com/nature/animals/we-domesticated-horses-why-not-zebras.html. They in fact are not as retarded as you, because Musk Ox don't even live in Africa. Did you mean Cape Buffalo? And are you too dumb to know a cape buffalo isn't a water buffalo? Because water buffalo also don't live in africa. That fucking Cape Buffalo is a tank with hooves and had NEVER been domesticated. It's one of Africas biggest killers even today. This is why express and magnum ammo is used on them.
Big cats are able to be domesticated but why? They require more food input than humans and are direct food competitors and you can't use them for work, or battle, or transportation. The term you meant was pet. Good luck catching a tiger with spears! No one domesticated big cats until sort of recently. Also they didn't have doggos, no doggos that the ATF shoots anyway. They had African Wild Dogs which are closer to Hyenias and, you guessed it (well you didn't but the smart people reading this did), they have never been domesticated.
You last statement is extra dumb, even dumb for you. Seriously impressively.dumb for a backwards racist. They DID trade for those things, especially after contact with other cultures. By this point though the damage was done. Rome toppled North Africa (Scippio) during the Punic wars. Rome also did the same to Europe coincidentally. Then the Muslims conquered Africa and are still, basically, there. As for sub saharan it was the opposite of what you think. They did trade for those things, have you ever noticed how many spices Indian food and eastern/southern african foods share? Wonder why. So if Africans didn't get animals as force multipliers until long after Euros and Asians then Africans were pretty far down the tech tree when the fighting started. You can imagine how that ended. You realise the Americas had the same plight? With the exception of Llamas (cringy drama lamas) in southern south america they had nothing. The Spanish guarded horses like the weapons they were and the South Wester Indians didn't have access to them until the 16th century. The Komanche went from dirt dwellers to human blenders of hooves in about two centuries. Seriously rivaling the mongols or Scythians as riders. But there's a long time between stirrup and gunpowder on the tech tree https://www.amazon.com/Empire-Summer-Moon-Comanches-Powerful/dp/1416591060
In summation (and in seriousness) the totality of human existence is vast and, while I'm not excusing the situation blacks in america have been put in and to a large extent put themselves into, it's better to realize that things are complicated and generally multifaceted and that history is WAY bigger than people realize. I should know, I still don't have enough degrees to be taken seriously on acedmia (and I have like 4)
Send it. Show me the proof of jews ruining US education. Show me this international Jewish cabal. I don't want some random rabbi saying death to whitey, I want something bigger than that.
For instance, you want to say Islam is a religion that propagates and teach violence? Here https://www.pewforum.org/2013/04/30/the-worlds-muslims-religion-politics-society-beliefs-about-sharia/ This study shows the overwhelming majority of self described muslims are cool with honor killings and murdering apostates. No back room bullshit conspiracy, just people admitting the way they feel to the tune of 70-80%
Show me that for Jews
If you're going to be cringe, don't do it with easy fact common knowledge stuff:
Egypt*
Kush
Nok
Carthage
Mali
Also, the North Africans had plenty of domestic animals (Numidian Calvary how the fuck can you forget that) but Sub Saharan didn't have animals capable of domestication. With all our technology today we can domesticate Zebras and shit
*I'll grant debatable but not if you're of the Grah Hancock persuasion
Can confirm from the defense dept side, they don't give a shit
Show me on the doll where the big mean scary evil Jew touched you.
How come no one can ever prove anything about this evil Jew conspiracy?
Better joke than I thought I'd get, I assumed your response would be "something something black people don't have working electricity something jews"
So basically my likelihood of being murdered by anyone (other than a 3 letter agency) outside of the inner cities is basically zero?
The problem isn't that they are black, it's that Democrat controlled inner cities have ruined the lives of these guys and the Dems just don't care because the inner cities just keep identifying as Dems
Therefore: I'm more likely to be killed by democrats than anyone else
Impressive situational awareness.