I can't believe I've never heard this before. Hell, I can't believe I didn't notice it the day of. That's a remarkably consistent rate of fire - no way it was produced by something as unreliable as a bump stock fire assist.
Designed for 50k, estimated 80-90k. That's a hell of a lot of extra pressure.
That round would've been 75% hotter than intended.
Perfectly succinct explanation, and just in time. Any earlier, and he would've made it before he got a new microphone.
Senator McCarthy also wasn't a member of the House Un-American Activities Committee.
That's one third hole the ATF can regulate without my objection!
When we win, remember: these people want you broke and dead, your kids raped and brainwashed, and they think it's funny.
felony possession of mushrooms
I'm getting real sick of reading nonsense.
handshake account, shortened link, ain't touchin' this one with a 40' pole.
Every person
who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia
Anybody in the USA
[who] subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof
who targets a citizen or lawful resident
the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws
and denies them a legal or Constitutional right
shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress
can get fucked in court
except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable.
unless they're a judge acting during trial
For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia. Section was formerly classified to section 43 of Title 8, Aliens and Nationality.
including Congress for making an illegal law to target residents of Washington, D.C.
All together now:
Anybody in the USA who targets a citizen or lawful resident and denies them a legal or Constitutional right can get fucked in court, unless they're a judge acting during a trial, including Congress for making an illegal law to target residents of Washington, D.C.
Disclaimer: I'm not a lawyer. I don't want to be a lawyer. Lawyers are, in general, miserable pieces of shite.
Disclaimer2: Negatively-charged Over-sized Igloo: This probably also protects people acting under the orders of a judge during a legal proceeding, such as a bailiff.
Disclaimer3: The Faggots in Government will likely say that the entire infringement is carried out in a judicial capacity and ignore or dismiss any suit under this law.
§ 1983. Civil action for deprivation of rights
Every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State or Territory or the District of Columbia, subjects, or causes to be subjected, any citizen of the United States or other person within the jurisdiction thereof to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws, shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable. For the purposes of this section, any Act of Congress applicable exclusively to the District of Columbia shall be considered to be a statute of the District of Columbia. Section was formerly classified to section 43 of Title 8, Aliens and Nationality.
AMENDMENTS
1996—Pub. L. 104–317 inserted before period at end of first sentence ‘‘, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity, injunctive relief shall not be granted unless a declaratory decree was violated or declaratory relief was unavailable’’.
1979—Pub. L. 96–170 inserted ‘‘or the District of Columbia’’ after ‘‘Territory’’, and provisions relating to Acts of Congress applicable solely to the District of Columbia.
EFFECTIVE DATE OF 1979 AMENDMENT
Amendment by Pub. L. 96–170 applicable with respect to any deprivation of rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution and laws occurring after Dec. 29, 1979, see section 3 of Pub. L. 96–170, set out as a note under section 1343 of Title 28, Judiciary and Judicial Procedure.
Totally unrelated:
§ 1984. Omitted
lul
The only meaningful function women can serve in an actual combat force is as a morale-force-multiplier (i.e. takin' dick), and the negative effects of their taking too much dick or not enough more than offsets the positive factors.
If you need to win a battle, you need to have zero Estrogen involved. If you don't need to win a battle, you don't need a military at all.
Israel makes it work (barely) because they have an existential threat on all sides.
The biggest threat an American woman is likely to face in her lifetime is either diabetes or the clap.
Islamist-Communist is slightly worse than regular Communist.
I thought I was the only one who lost his antique matchlock in the Mississippi.
I'm not sure that would all fit on one bat, or actually work, but damn would I like to see someone try.
My pronouns are Seven-six-two millimeter./Full metal jacket. and you will use them to referring to me in the third person, bigot.
The video's old enough he hadn't gone full retard yet.
In March 1963, Lee Harvey Oswald, using the alias "A. Hidell", purchased by mail order a 6.5×52mm Carcano Model 91/38 infantry rifle (described by the President's Commission on the Assassination of President Kennedy as a "Mannlicher–Carcano") with a telescopic sight.
Nifty bit of history.
I do get a laugh from it - the entire front page is filled with the kind of posts and comments that got me perma-banned from the Reddit version.
Not everybody can comfortably grip double-stack .45, and if you can't grip it, you can't shoot it accurately.
Here's a series of very clear questions:
- If you pay a man to rob me, are you still a civilian?
- If you pay a man to kidnap me, are you still a civilian?
- If you pay a man to kill me, are you still a civilian?
- If you look at a list of the circumstances in which you already pay to have me robbed, kidnapped, or killed, and you think to yourself "That list just isn't long enough." and so you agitate to double it in length, make it less clear, and enforcement more aggressive, are you still a civilian?
Your 'clear statement' assumes that there's no such thing as violence-by-proxy, or that those who engage in violence-by-proxy are not morally culpable for having done so.
If you're in the mood for metaphor, the ATF is merely the boot, politicians who direct them the foot. Those who vote for gun control are the leg, the beating heart, the brain of the infringement engine.
That’s what allows you to walk with your head held high
I believe the wartime advice is "Keep yer friggin head down, moron. You wanna get shot?"
Would've been just fine if it wasn't for all the fraudulent Biden ballots.
Unfortunately, anyone who went into this election not expecting Democrat fraud on an industrial scale is an idiot.
I'm no expert on CA law (or law in general), but it looks like the entire California "assault weapons" ban (or at least the enforcement portions) just got struck down.
Can we get this man on SCOUTUS? I'd like to see what he'd say about the NFA (hint: it rhymes with "duck).