The gubmint: WE FINNA SEND TROOPS AFTER YOU DOMESTIC TERRIES. the troops:
(media.weekendgunnit.win)
Comments (19)
sorted by:
The troops are fat remember when the army was at the Capitol after January 6th it was all women and fat people and fat women out army is a joke now
Fun fact, I was at a bonfire party innawoods and having a marvelous time.
Started talking to a dude who was in an infantry unit about guns and shit. We were having a nice time.
Then the faggot says how anyone trying to keep their guns when his unit rolls to town will die.
He's very obviously not armed whereas Uncle Scruffy had his beloved 45c on like usual.
Funny faggot, threatening people and not being armed.
I never said a word but that silly dildo locker would be shocked to hear how easily people can be found when they don't have a uniform and an APC.
People are fucking stupid. I have no idea why they want to do violence when there are some serious consequences.
It's weird that people think they can do horrible things and then just go back to normal life.
For the government agency reading this, I don't support violence or nasty things against you. It's just talking about some fag I met at a party.
Tactics are a grunt's concern, Strategy is a Chad's concern.
Morons don't understand that they can roll into a town and kill everyone, but that will only strengthen the determination to win of the next town.
More hilariously, even if they win they will still end up in ze pod, fed ze bugs, owning notzing, while their children are raped and brainwashed.
Yup, even if they win, they lose, and we die free men.
They may confiscate unscathed from the first poor bastard on the street, but I can't imagine the rest of the neighborhood getting down with losing their god-given and constitutionally-protected rights.
It's sad how things have changed, in my day the overwhelming majority of infantrymen would take their issued shit and start batting for the home team in that instance, but this was early gwot times and the deployment tempo was very high so most of us had been to a combat zone and actually seen shit and understood what we were fighting for, your buddy there was probably some leftist boot that hasn't done much counter insurgency work, especially given his we'll just kill them all mentality.
I think you nailed it right there. Sounds like the guy. With luck he's too fat and tranny now to put on plates.
I have 6 dead hooker bags full of accoutrement that I'm waiting to issue out.
I'll bet this guy was a pog out LARPing. If he was a grunt, he was one of the ones who got suckered into the honor guard, or yall's reactor guard horseshit.
Having said that, I've worked with both our grunts in recent years: and God help us all. At this point, the DOD is struggling with wet paper bags. If you only knew how bad it was.
And yet I have seen dumber
I'd love to see this guy start a panic draw.
Well, the thing is you don't draw while belt-carrying. First thing you gotta do is to disable any kind of safety. Then when the shit hits the fan you drop down on your side (sliding is optional), distract the threat with the loose shorts view of your pucker hole, while grabbing the gun at it's base and jerking it forwards and back to fire.
I'm guessing this is kuwait... i wonder if the magazine is loaded.. Damn I hated those old Berettas.
What problems did you recall, or did you just not like 'em?
As a 'tist I always like hearing what people thought about guns they were forced into carrying.
Beretta's early work was a little too new wave for my taste. But when the 92 came out in '76 I think they really came into their own, commercially and artistically. The whole series has clear, crisp lines and a new sheen of consummate professionalism that really gives the user a big boost. They've been compared to Walther, but I think Beretta has a far more moustachioed, ante pasta sense of design.
As a design, they don't look bad and I agree about your thought of the look - it sort of defined what a pistol was for many years similar to the colt 1911 in it's time and even now. However, after rattling around the inventory for years and having God knows how many rounds put through them, they lost a lot of the swagger imo and would jam often, shoot inconsistent groupings, and for me it just didn't fit my hand well. I enjoyed the fielding of the M17 because i shoot it great, and i got it brand spanking new. I was literally the only person to have fired that weapon. sincerely wish I could have "lost" it after that deployment and paid the $125 dollar FLIPL for it... buuut the army freaks out about losing weapons unless you're a leftist politician or have a star... but i'm being redundant as those are the same things these days.
Yes, it is a government retardation problem not a gun problem
I had gathered some knowledge of problems these have had.
Worn and cracked locking blocks. Cracked slides. Frame intended to last 'n' rounds for lifetime but military service lifetime is 'n(5)' rounds. Checkmate brand magazines have coating that does not do well in dusty or sandy environments.
I see it every day at my work, but with industrial equipment. Shit gets worn out and needs to be replaced, but it works juuuust good enough to not be broke so it never gets replaced.
Yep, exactly. it is a testament to it's design that they were able to last as long as they did, especially under the maintenance and use/abuse they received.
Industrial equipment in private practice i think is a little more understandable since profits are the concern. If it is down for mx for x hours a month causing y loss of production/profits and repair costs, but the replacement would be z hours down and e cost of replacement and installation cost, and z+e is greater than x+y than unless you can get a consideration of predictability, increased production through upgrade, reduced labor cost, or something else to tip the balance, you're always going to stick with the old equipment/part.
The military however has a greater imperative in the instantaneous full functioning use of a device/system/piece of equipment under adverse environmental conditions which demands a different metric. The problem is that those using the equipment aren't the same as those buying it and the military has no value for time. so even if it takes 14 hours to service and repair an aging pos for every hour of use, they just make their workforce work those long hours and get to retain the use without assuming any cost... until you look at retention... but they don't like that part because it means there might be a problem with them the people in charge.
Beretta isn't a design problem, it is a government problem.
Someone show this to anyone carrying with an empty chamber. Same thing. Also...Drax them sclownst.